Archive for 2009

National Chemistry Week Seminar : Can a chemical reaction help fight global warming?

Tuesday, September 1st, 2009

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Could a Sour Natural Gas Process Convert Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) into harmless compounds?

Attend discussion on if an exothermic chemical reaction could contribute in the fight against global warming and climate change.

WHAT:

The Stenger Wasas Process (SWAP): A suite of hydrocarbon refining solutions that, in the laboratory, has been verified to rapidly reduce H2S to below detectable limits by gas chromatography (under 4ppb) and may be able to convert CO2 into carbon, water and sulfur industrially.  Discoverers of the SWAP invite academicians and experts to discuss the science and its potential contributions to the global warming solution.

WHERE:

Philip Alampi Auditorium, Rutgers University Cook Campus
School of Environmental and Biological Sciences
71 Dudley Road (corner of College Farm and Dudley Rd.)
New Brunswick, NJ

WHEN: Wed., Oct. 21

2:30 p.m. – 4:30 p.m.

RSVP:             www.swapsol.com/events.php

Open Admission      Q & A Following

WHO:

Raymond Stenger and James Wasas invite members of the academic and professional communities on Wednesday, Oct. 21, 2009, to learn about the Stenger-Wasas Process (SWAP), proposing that a reaction between carbon dioxide (CO2) and hydrogen sulfide (H2S) eliminates both (2H2S + CO2 => 2H2O + 2S + C) in a mildly exothermic reaction and could alter the course of global warming and impact escalating energy costs.  Hear and discuss the science behind the SWAP and its potential impact on the hydrocarbon industry.

PARTICIPANTS

  • Raymond Stenger (B.S.,WV University ‘57)
  • James Wasas (B.S., Rutgers ‘68)
  • Wolf Koch, Ph.D, Chemical Engineering, University of Cincinnati (B.S., Rutgers ‘68), President, Technology Resources International, Inc.
  • Gene Hall, Ph.D, Analytical Chemistry, Rutgers University (independent GC verification)
  • Randa Fahmy-Hudome, Former U.S. Associate Deputy Energy Secretary

Stenger and Wasas will discuss the catalytic and recombinant science behind the reaction.  Dr. Wolf Koch will discuss the potential commercial applications.  Q & A will follow: Dr. Hall will answer questions about his independent chemical and gas chromatography (GC) analysis; Executives will answer questions about findings and verifications of thermodynamic and chemical kinetic results showing scalability of the SWAP.

If you would like to attend, please visit: www.swapsol.com/events.php

Can sulfur recovery breakthroughs reduce our environmental footprint?

Saturday, August 22nd, 2009

There has been a recent discovery of a previously unknown exothermic reaction between CO2 and H2S.  It’s a reaction that may fundamentally alter the hydrocarbon industry.  Work continues.  It’s called the Stenger-Wasas Process (SWAP) developed by Ray Stenger and Jim Wasas.  And it may make obsolete traditional petroleum methods, such as the Claus Process and its variants.

The SWAP: Unrefined sour natural gas is fed into the catalytic reactor, where the SWAP reaction occurs between CO2 and H2S. Refined gas flows past the separator. CO2 and H2S are converted into water, sulfur and carbon in the collector. In a reaction that can start in less than one second at very moderate temperatures, the result of the SWAP is refined natural gas.

Brief Overview

Sulfur contaminants such as hydrogen sulfide (H2S), carbonyl sulfide (COS), and mercaptans in gas streams can create unacceptable levels of sulfur emissions in power applications or poison catalysts used in chemical synthesis. Sulfur contaminants are usually reduced to less than 300 ppm for power generation and considerably lower (<1 ppm) for the synthesis of methanol, ammonia, and Fischer-Tropsch (FT) liquids.

Sulfur recovery unit (courtesty: C&I)

Sulfur recovery unit (courtesy: C&I)

Sulfur Recovery Processes

Removing sulfur from a natural gas or syngas process stream is only part of the story. The residual sulfur present in an acid gas stream must then be recovered to prevent environmental and safety harms, as well as meet operator permit requirements. Two main technologies have traditionally been used commercially to recover sulfur: the Claus process (partial combustion) for high levels of sulfur, and catalytic Redox processes, for relatively low levels of sulfur. In recent years, bio-chemical based technology, the Thiopaq Process, has been developed and commercially implemented. Other recent developments include the development of hybrid processes that combine Claus and Redox technology and are used for tailgas cleanup in Claus plants.

The SWAP has been verified by gas chromatography in the laboratory to reduce H2S to below the limit of detection (about 4ppb) in a single pass through the SWAP column.

The SWAP in the laboratory

The SWAP in the laboratory

Classified as hazardous waste by the EPA, H2S disposal requires expensive processing, i.e. the Claus Process. The SWAP may reduce related capital costs for the H2S disposal resulting from crude oil desulfurization, while simultaneously eliminating substantial amounts of CO2.

CLAUS PROCESS

Technology Description

In the Claus process, a high H2S concentration stream is the feedstock for recovery to elemental sulfur. Roughly 1/3 of the H2S is burnt (partial combustion) to form sulfur dioxide (SO2). The remaining H2S reacts with the synthesized SO2 over an alumina or bauxite catalyst to produce elemental sulfur. Depending on their concentrations, the unreacted components (tail gas), such as residual SO2, CO2, and H2S, are either emitted, thermally oxidized, or further treated in an additional recovery process.

(US Environmental Protection Agency, AP42, 5th Edition, “Compilation of AirPollutant Emissions Factors Volume 1: Stationary Point and Area Sources, 1995) The Claus process is thermodynamically limited to ~97 percent sulfur recovery, although additional treatment steps, such as tail gas sulfur recovery, can increase the recovery rate.

Commercial Manufacturers and Applications

The Claus process is the oldest commercial sulfur treatment process, with development dating back to the late 19th century. Today, Claus processes are the main step used for elemental sulfur production worldwide-in fact, 90 percent to 95 percent of the sulfur recovered in the United States was from the Claus process. Almost 40 companies operate over 1000 Claus processes in the United States, recovering nearly 9 million tons per year of sulfur. The petroleum and natural gas industries are the main users of the technology, with IGCC applications making up a small but growing segment of the user population.

With catalytic refining, environmental footprint and operational costs can be lowered. This and other breakthroughs may change the landscape of hydrocarbon refining.  www.swapsol.com

A word on clean coal , Syngas and CO2 storage

Wednesday, August 19th, 2009

Much has been made of late about the benefits and/or viability of so-called clean coal technologies.  Indeed, in a national ad campaign the Reality Coalition has suggested that the aforementioned technology is an outright myth.  Yet depending on who you talk to,  the next decade may show these “clean coal” technologies will play a much larger role in electricity generation.

IGCC process (courtesy: Clean Coal Illinois)

IGCC process (courtesy: Clean Coal Illinois)

Among these  “clean” technologies is the production of synthesis gas (Syngas) through a relatively new process called Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC).  In short, heating coal under pressure in an oxygen-restricted environment produces Syngas, a mixture of carbon monoxide (CO), hydrogen (H2), methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2).  With the notable exception of CO2, each of these products can be burned as fuel.  Methane is the chief component of natural gas.  Carbon monoxide and hydrogen can be burned in a gas turbine, or processed to produce liquid fuels through the Fischer-Tropsch process.

The scientific consensus on CO2 is that man-made carbon dioxide tops the list of global warming causes. Proponents of “clean coal” trumpet carbon capture and sequestration as a panacea; but it may be this line of thinking that has detractors and environmentalists up in arms.  While the science of Syngas technology is fairly well established, CO2 storage and sequestration is still an immerging technology, one we hope will gain ground given what we see as several notable obstacles.

CO2 capture and storage (courtesy: Total, S.A.)

CO2 capture & storage (courtesy: Total, S.A.)

But CO2 storage, potentially an attractive option, often hinges upon certain geological criteria.  If this option is to be taken seriously, we must identify compatible carbon sinks and depleted oilfields capable of permanently and safely housing large volumes of CO2. At an off shore undersea aquifer off Norway, for example, Statoil buries carbon dioxide extracted from natural gas to avoid paying pollution taxes to the Norwegian government.   And offshore storage, while effective, comes at a heavy cost both in terms of capital and energy efficiency.

What are the ways science can support these alternatives through supporting technologies?   Any working energy policy must be multi-tiered to be effective.  CO2 capture will certainly have its place in the new energy economy.  And with clean coal, we believe that cooperation across industries is the only answer.  When these companies begin to share new, tested and available technologies, we believe coal and its derivates may truly provide a substantial source of clean energy in the future. www.swapsol.com

Evolving energy policy ignoring Hydrogen Sulfide in global warming causes

Monday, August 17th, 2009

Hydrogen Sulfide (H2S) isn’t the first thing you think about when you try and identify environmental enemies.  That is, of course, if you don’t live next to a landfill.  But it is attracting more and more attention in local communities, following reports of children feeling sick, public water being contaminated, and of course, the foul stench it creates when its gas emissions are released into the air.

Hydrogen Sulfide has been around for a long time.   In fact, some scholars theorize it was partly responsible for the “first mass extinction” millions of years before the dinosaurs met their demise.  They hypothesize this occurred during the Permian period, between 299 to 252.6 million years ago.  They think the Hydrogen Sulfide emitted from the oceans and elsewhere, such as “flood basalts,” turned the sky green, chocked off oxygen for plants, animals and marine life and killed 90 percent of species in the oceans and 70 percent of life on land.  That was a natural phenomenon.  But one expert thinks we’re on track for opening that door again.

Permian Period 291 - 251 million years ago (courtesty University of Michigan)

Permian Period 291 - 251 million years ago (courtesy University of Michigan)

“We’ve had these mass extinctions [from hydrogen sulfide] when carbon dioxide has hit 1,000 ppm. We have not hit that [level] for 100 million years,” said Peter Ward, professor of paleontology at University of Washington.  “But we are currently at 380 ppm — and climbing rapidly at 2 ppm a year and accelerating — and this is the highest CO2 I think in the last 40 million years. The only time [these extinctions] ever happened in the past is when these big flood basalts happened. But now we’re making it happen far faster than the flood basalts ever did. This is a unique event in the history of the planet.” (Wired Magazine 3/2008)

H2S should certainly be part of the discussion over global warming causes, but there of course remains the question of what to do with CO2.  Emit it or bury it (energy policy is driving carbon capture technologies still in the emerging stages of course.)  Like energy, you can’t destroy it. But what if you could turn it into something else?

But finally, what if you could turn H2S into something else as well?  www.swapsol.com

An Inconvenient Truth Inspired a Breakthrough in Natural Gas Conversion

Thursday, August 13th, 2009

It looks like two New Jersey scientists have come up with something that may potentially have a significant impact on our future energy policy, and it comes from toxic hydrogen sulfide (H2S).

"An Inconvenient Truth" (2006)

Ray Stenger went to see Al Gore’s “An Inconvenient Truth” when it came out in 2006.  An engineer by trade, Stenger already a deep understanding of the chemistry behind the elements Gore proposed as global warming causes, among those being carbon dioxide.

But while Stenger was intrigued by some of the claims made by the documentary, he still had some questions about how we got into this mess in the first place.  Addiction to oil and coal were the obvious reasons because of sulfur, sulfur dioxide (SO2) and of course, carbon dioxide. Chief emitters were the coal plants, the concrete plants and the oil refineries.  But he kept coming back to carbon dioxide. With two parts oxygen, CO2 should theoretically be a powerful oxidizer.

Ray Stenger and Jim Wasas

Ray Stenger and Jim Wasas

He got together over lunch with his friend, Jim Wasas.  Among other things, Wasas was a specialist in catalysts.  Over the months they talked. Being the entrepreneurs that they were, they worked to figure out what conditions need to exist for CO2 to begin breaking down into its components. In 2007, they figured it out. And they figured out that hydrogen sulfide played a key role. But they needed to find a place where H2S and CO2 were both present. It was “sour” natural gas – an area of key interest of those involved in natural gas conversion and processing. Then came the catalyst to finish the job. Wasas’s extensive experience in catalysts brought him around to a hidden-in-plain-sight natural material that did the job extremely well.  And the discovery has been shown to potentially have a wide range of applications.  They call this suite of solutions the “Stenger-Wasas Process” (SWAP).

In less than a second in a single laboratory column, the SWAP reacts H2S and CO2, converting the mix into water, carbon and sulfur. The SWAP is not a carbon capture process. It is a conversion and elimination process based on a previously undiscovered exothermic reaction between the two. Stenger and Wasas seemed to have stumbled upon and verified An Inconvenient Truth if only because it’s not in the textbooks yet. http://www.swapsol.com