Posts Tagged ‘co2’

EPA proposes oil and gas to report emissions

Sunday, March 28th, 2010

Late last year at the Global Refining Strategies Summit in Houston,  major industry executives talked about new Washington rules on CO2 emissions not in terms of “if,” but “when.”  If you aren’t in the oil and gas business and blinked during the last three weeks during the healthcare battle on Capitol Hill, you might have missed the news:

March 4, 2010 WASHINGTON – The Environmental Protection Agency intends to require that power plants, refineries and other major sources of global-warming pollution get permits beginning in 2011 that would require them to cut emissions, the agency’s leader said Wednesday.

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said the EPA wants to regulate sources emitting more than 75,000 tons a year of polluting gaseous oxides (CO2, etc.) over the next three years.  Exactly how the EPA intends to monitor and regulate these emissions is the singular issue not lost on the environmental and industry lobbies in D.C.  Get ready for a knock-down drag out over what the country’s enviro-political landscape will or should look like for years to come.

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson

EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson

But stepping back, here’s what the EPA has done: it has proposed that oil, gas and other entities that emit CO2 and related pollutants be added to an existing list of companies that report their emissions levels yearly.  One pollutant cited by the EPA is methane, a gas generated by the petroleum industry that traps 20 percent more heat than carbon and is considered a major factor in climate change.  Another area the EPA is interested in is CO2 injection or “flooding” – a method used by producers to push oil out of the ground.

“Gathering this information is the first step toward reducing greenhouse emissions and fostering innovative technologies for the clean energy future,” said Jackson.

The industries cited will be asked to begin recording their emissions for a report submitted in 2012.

Research & Development

SWAPSOL Sulfur Cycle

SWAPSOL Sulfur Cycle

Swapsol Corp. may have a potential solution that may make the worry over CO2 emissions a thing of the past.

SWAPSOL is developing commercial processes around a newly discovered chemical reaction verified to reduce hydrogen sulfide (H2S) below detectable levels while reacting with carbon dioxide (CO2) to form water, sulfur and carsuls, a carbon-sulfur polymer.

The Stenger-Wasas Process (SWAP) stands to fundamentally simplify sulfur removal technology as it consumes carbon dioxide in an exothermic reaction under relatively mild process conditions.

SWAPSOL will again present its science to the international oil and gas industry at the Global Refining Summit May 17-19  in Rotterdam.  It returns to Houston October 26-27 to meet with industry at the Global Refining Strategies Summit.

Beyond Copenhagen: Cap & Trade or Carbon Tax? Or what?

Thursday, December 31st, 2009
French President Nicolas Sarkozy

French President Nicolas Sarkozy

The French version of the Supreme Court this week shot down a carbon tax proposal that the Nicolas Sarkozy administration hailed as a fundamental weapon against climate change. The court cited too many loopholes. Today, France’s economic minister is offering a new proposal he says will close many of those loopholes and says the new proposal is a necessary tool to fight CO2 emissions.

As a follow-up to our earlier post looking at the Carbon Offset, we wanted to take a summary look at two other CO2 mitigation plans. Unlike the Carbon Offset, which typically is an industry-driven solution, two others are the so-called “cap & trade” system and the straight carbon tax.   Both require direct involvement from government.

Cap & Trade

What is the so-called “cap & trade” system?  Long in place as a method for managing pollution in Europe, cap & trade is a two-part system where a government sets a cap on the volume of particular greenhouse gases (GHG) (carbon dioxide, mercury, nitrous oxide and sulfur)  can be emitted.  The government then sets up a system where companies can earn “credits” when they emit fewer emissions. Companies can sell these credits to other organizations unable to currently meet their caps.  Proponents of cap & trade contend a government can reach their overall emissions caps at the lowest possible cost.  Critics of cap & trade say the system is flawed, arguing it is cheaper for many companies to purchase the credits rather than invest in technology to reduce their emissions.  Thus, they say, it does nothing to impact CO2 emissions in the long-term and merely serves as an arbitrary tax in the short-term.

Carbon Tax

The other CO2 mitigation proposal is the carbon tax.  Relatively self-explanatory, the carbon tax is an excise tax on the carbon content of fossil fuels (oil, gas, coal).  Those in favor of the carbon tax say it is the simplest and most efficient way of pricing emissions and will quickly spur investment in carbon reduction.  Those against say it is a regressive tax that punishes those smaller companies unable to withstand the penalties and will hurt small business and put people out of work.  Many economists and experts believe the carbon tax should be phased in over time so as to allow companies and organizations adapt.

At the end of the day there are arguments from every angle.  In whatever way CO2 mitigation is achieved, we can rest assured it will take not only determined investment in technology, but also a sustained belief that it is our obligation as people to do what we can to save the environment, and ultimately, ourselves.

www.swapsol.com